Rocky Brands vs Steven Madden
RCKY and SHOO side by side, both in consumer discretionary. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How RCKY and SHOO compare
Steven Madden is the larger company, worth 8.6 times as much as Rocky Brands ($3.2B against $369M).
Steven Madden grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (18.2% versus 9.2% for Rocky Brands).
Both pay dividends: Rocky Brands yields 1.3% and Steven Madden 1.9%.
Rocky Brands scores higher on the StockData Score (16 against 10 for Steven Madden), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | RCKY | SHOO |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $369M | $3.2B |
| Share price | $49.27 | $43.50 |
| Change, 1 year | 69.1% | 26.4% |
| Change, 5 years | 17.5% | −12.6% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.55 | 1.16 |
| Employees | 2,200 | 6,300 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 16 (better) | 10 |
| Valuation score | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 3 | 3 |
| Performance score | 4 (better) | 1 |
| Health score | 2 | 4 (better) |
| Dividend score | 4 (better) | 2 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 12.9× | – |
| P/S | 0.7× (better) | 1.2× |
| P/B | 1.4× (better) | 3.4× |
| EV/EBITDA | 9.0× (better) | 13.7× |
| P/FCF | 22.5× | 14.2× (better) |
| PEG | 6.10 | – |
| FCF yield | 4.5% | 7.0% (better) |
| Fair value | $53.37 | $31.98 |
| Margin of safety | 7.7% (better) | −36.0% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 9.2% | 18.2% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 11.7% | 16.1% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 54.9% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 54.0% | – |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 0.69% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 42.2% | 46.1% (better) |
| Operating margin | 8.8% (better) | 7.5% |
| Net margin | 5.7% | – |
| FCF margin | 3.3% | 8.2% (better) |
| Return on equity | 11.5% | – |
| Return on invested capital | 9.7% | 15.1% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.46 | 0.13 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 2.19 | 0.51 (better) |
| Current ratio | 2.97 (better) | 1.91 |
| Altman Z-score | 3.30 | 5.76 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 7 | – |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 1.3% | 1.9% (better) |
| Payout ratio | 16.5% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 2.1% | 41.1% (better) |
| Buyback yield | 0.54% (better) | 0.43% |
| Shareholder yield | 1.9% | 2.4% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 81.0% | 100% |
| Held by insiders | 3.7% | 2.3% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$1.9M (better) | −$4.0M |
| Short interest, % of float | 2.7% | 6.3% |
Go deeper
- RCKY stock overview
- RCKY income statement
- RCKY valuation and score
- SHOO stock overview
- SHOO income statement
- SHOO valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.