StockData

AVITA Medical vs TELA Bio

RCEL and TELA side by side, both in surgical, medical, and dental instruments and supplies. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How RCEL and TELA compare

AVITA Medical is the larger company, worth 13 times as much as TELA Bio ($501M against $38.6M).

AVITA Medical grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (17.0% versus 1.5% for TELA Bio).

AVITA Medical keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −42.7% compared with −53.6% at TELA Bio.

AVITA Medical scores higher on the StockData Score (5 against 3 for TELA Bio), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricRCELTELA
Size and price
Market cap$501M$38.6M
Share price$16.20$0.860
Change, 1 year309%−27.7%
Change, 5 years8.1%−93.2%
Beta (5Y)1.960.63
Employees226218
StockData Score
Total score5 (better)3
Valuation score01 (better)
Growth score3 (better)1
Performance score11
Health score1 (better)0
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S5.9×0.5× (better)
FCF yield−3.8% (better)−89.1%
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)17.0% (better)1.5%
Revenue growth, 5Y average67.2% (better)34.5%
Profitability
Gross margin82.4% (better)67.2%
Operating margin−33.9% (better)−43.2%
Net margin−42.7% (better)−53.6%
FCF margin−22.8% (better)−44.0%
Return on invested capital−276%−238% (better)
Financial health
Interest coverage−5.1×−4.3× (better)
Current ratio1.20 (better)0.61
Altman Z-score−9.18 (better)−13.22
Piotroski F-score33
Dividends and buybacks
Shareholder yield0.00%0.00%
Ownership
Held by institutions15.9%70.5%
Held by insiders2.7%41.0%
Insider net buying, 12 months$235K (better)$186K
Short interest, % of float–2.2%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.