StockData

Quantum Computing vs Exascale Labs

QUBT and XLAB side by side, both in computer programming, data processing, and other computer related services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How QUBT and XLAB compare

Quantum Computing is the larger company, worth 386884 times as much as Exascale Labs ($1.3B against $3.4K).

Quantum Computing grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (3369% versus 111% for Exascale Labs).

Exascale Labs keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −82.1% compared with −172% at Quantum Computing.

Quantum Computing scores higher on the StockData Score (9 against 7 for Exascale Labs), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricQUBTXLAB
Size and price
Market cap$1.3B$3.4K
Share price$5.82$2.27
Change, 1 year−51.3%−77.5%
Change, 5 years−11.7%–
Beta (5Y)2.26−0.38
Employees7212
StockData Score
Total score9 (better)7
Valuation score11
Growth score22
Performance score1 (better)0
Health score5 (better)4
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S69.6×0.0× (better)
P/B0.8×–
FCF yield−4.6%–
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)3369% (better)111%
Profitability
Gross margin−8.2%16.3% (better)
Operating margin−498%−32.4% (better)
Net margin−172%−82.1% (better)
FCF margin−323%–
Return on equity−2.6%–
Return on invested capital−14.9%–
Financial health
Debt / equity0.00–
Interest coverage−488.9×–
Current ratio53.36 (better)0.20
Altman Z-score16.85 (better)−9.96
Piotroski F-score45 (better)
Dividends and buybacks
Buyback yield−54.9%–
Shareholder yield−54.9%0.00% (better)
Ownership
Held by institutions45.5%–
Held by insiders11.7%7.7%
Insider net buying, 12 months−$648K–
Short interest, % of float34.6%–

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.