Quhuo vs Zhihu
QH and ZH side by side, both in miscellaneous business services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How QH and ZH compare
Quhuo grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (−17.1% versus −23.6% for Zhihu).
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | QH | ZH |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Share price | $3.04 | $2.66 |
| Change, 1 year | 148% | −35.4% |
| Change, 5 years | −100.0% | −94.4% |
| Beta (5Y) | 3.70 | 1.14 |
| Employees | 474 | 269 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 2 | 2 |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 0 | 0 |
| Performance score | 0 | 0 |
| Health score | 2 | 2 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −17.1% (better) | −23.6% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | −0.43% | 15.2% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −5625% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −1200% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 0.49% | 59.9% (better) |
| Operating margin | −7.0% (better) | −18.5% |
| Net margin | −5.9% | – |
| FCF margin | −1.6% (better) | −13.3% |
| Return on equity | −36.5% | – |
| Return on invested capital | −29.7% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.32 | 0.01 (better) |
| Interest coverage | −42.4× | – |
| Current ratio | 1.03 | 3.73 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 2 | – |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | – | 4.8% |
| Held by insiders | 10.3% | 24.8% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | – | −$1.0K |
Go deeper
- QH stock overview
- QH income statement
- QH valuation and score
- ZH stock overview
- ZH income statement
- ZH valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.