PowerCompute vs SHF
PWCM and SHFS side by side, both in finance services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How PWCM and SHFS compare
PowerCompute is the larger company, worth 29 times as much as SHF ($892K against $31.2K).
PowerCompute grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (16.3% versus −14.6% for SHF).
SHF keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −61.3% compared with −414% at PowerCompute.
SHF scores higher on the StockData Score (8 against 5 for PowerCompute), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | PWCM | SHFS |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $892K | $31.2K |
| Share price | $0.497 | $0.030 |
| Change, 1 year | −98.2% | −99.8% |
| Change, 5 years | −99.9% | −100.0% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.99 | 1.06 |
| Employees | 16 | 39 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 5 | 8 (better) |
| Valuation score | 3 (better) | 1 |
| Growth score | 2 (better) | 0 |
| Performance score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Health score | 0 | 5 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/S | 0.1× | 0.0× (better) |
| P/B | 0.1× | 0.0× (better) |
| FCF yield | −1971% | – |
| Fair value | $7.31 | – |
| Margin of safety | 93.2% | – |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 16.3% (better) | −14.6% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 47.6% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Operating margin | −325% | −63.2% (better) |
| Net margin | −414% | −61.3% (better) |
| FCF margin | −200% | – |
| Return on equity | −148% | −79.7% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | −71.5% (better) | −114% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.49 (better) | 0.00 |
| Interest coverage | −14.9× | – |
| Current ratio | 0.99 | 1.59 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | −6.33 (better) | −13.91 |
| Piotroski F-score | 2 | 4 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 5.2% | 77.4% |
| Held by insiders | 75.7% | – |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $29.0K | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 42.2% | – |
Go deeper
- PWCM stock overview
- PWCM income statement
- PWCM valuation and score
- SHFS stock overview
- SHFS income statement
- SHFS valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.