StockData

Pearson vs Thomson Reuters

PSO and TRI side by side, both in printing, publishing, and allied industries. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How PSO and TRI compare

Thomson Reuters grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (3.0% versus 0.70% for Pearson).

Thomson Reuters keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 20.1% compared with 9.4% at Pearson.

Pearson scores higher on the StockData Score (8 against 5 for Thomson Reuters), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricPSOTRI
Size and price
Share price$17.37$118.25
Change, 1 year22.2%−23.8%
Change, 5 years113%−1.4%
Beta (5Y)0.370.58
Employees4,722–
StockData Score
Total score8 (better)5
Valuation score00
Growth score22
Performance score4 (better)2
Health score2 (better)1
Dividend score00
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)0.70%3.0% (better)
Revenue growth, 5Y average1.0%4.6% (better)
Net income growth (TTM)−22.8% (better)−32.0%
EPS growth (TTM)−20.2% (better)−31.9%
EPS growth, 5Y average−59.0%8.2% (better)
Profitability
Gross margin52.0%–
Operating margin14.2%28.5% (better)
Net margin9.4%20.1% (better)
FCF margin–27.0%
Return on equity8.7%–
Return on invested capital7.6%–
Financial health
Debt / equity0.41–
Net debt / EBITDA2.261.11 (better)
Interest coverage5.2×–
Current ratio–0.51
Piotroski F-score56 (better)
Dividends and buybacks
Payout ratio47.8%–
Ownership
Held by institutions4.2%89.5%
Held by insiders31.8%–

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.