ParaZero Technologies vs Rail Vision
PRZO and RVSN side by side. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How PRZO and RVSN compare
Rail Vision grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (14.4% versus 12.3% for ParaZero Technologies).
ParaZero Technologies keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −517% compared with −746% at Rail Vision.
Rail Vision scores higher on the StockData Score (9 against 7 for ParaZero Technologies), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | PRZO | RVSN |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Share price | $0.428 | $2.19 |
| Change, 1 year | −67.3% | −99.4% |
| Beta (5Y) | 2.13 | – |
| Employees | 22 | 12 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 7 | 9 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Performance score | 1 | 1 |
| Health score | 5 | 5 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 12.3% | 14.4% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −68.7% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 4.8% | 37.1% (better) |
| Operating margin | −721% (better) | −789% |
| Net margin | −517% (better) | −746% |
| FCF margin | −557% (better) | −622% |
| Return on equity | −97.9% | −57.7% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | – | −3807% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Current ratio | 5.10 | 9.60 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 3 | 5 (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 7.1% | – |
| Held by insiders | 2.7% | 17.6% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$14.8K | −$10.9K (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 5.9% | – |
Go deeper
- PRZO stock overview
- PRZO income statement
- PRZO valuation and score
- RVSN stock overview
- RVSN income statement
- RVSN valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.