Priority Technology vs Sezzle
PRTH and SEZL side by side, both in miscellaneous business services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How PRTH and SEZL compare
Sezzle is the larger company, worth 7.9 times as much as Priority Technology ($5.1B against $651M).
On earnings, Priority Technology is cheaper: it trades at 16.1× trailing earnings, against 29.4× for Sezzle.
Sezzle grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (38.9% versus 10.1% for Priority Technology).
Sezzle scores higher on the StockData Score (10 against 9 for Priority Technology), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | PRTH | SEZL |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $651M | $5.1B |
| Share price | $7.90 | $152.65 |
| Change, 1 year | 41.8% | 163% |
| Change, 5 years | 28.5% | 27997% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.01 | −0.82 |
| Employees | 1,200 | 201 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 9 | 10 (better) |
| Valuation score | 4 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 3 | 3 |
| Performance score | 1 | 4 (better) |
| Health score | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 16.1× (better) | 29.4× |
| P/S | 0.6× (better) | 8.8× |
| P/B | – | 18.5× |
| EV/EBITDA | 7.4× (better) | 20.7× |
| P/FCF | 6.0× (better) | 17.3× |
| FCF yield | 16.7% (better) | 5.8% |
| Fair value | $13.98 | $116.23 |
| Margin of safety | 43.5% (better) | −31.3% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 10.1% | 38.9% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 18.7% | 50.3% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | 57.7% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −7.5% | 60.7% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 12.3% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 39.1% | – |
| Operating margin | 13.2% | 41.9% (better) |
| Net margin | – | 31.4% |
| FCF margin | 10.6% | 51.2% (better) |
| Return on equity | – | 84.3% |
| Return on invested capital | 12.7% | 169% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Net debt / EBITDA | 4.30 | – |
| Interest coverage | 1.6× | 19.1× (better) |
| Current ratio | 1.10 | 4.21 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 0.74 | 19.14 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | – | 8 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Buyback yield | – | 1.3% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 1.3% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 23.6% | 44.1% |
| Held by insiders | 59.7% | 45.2% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$23.8K (better) | −$26.8M |
| Short interest, % of float | – | 23.9% |
Go deeper
- PRTH stock overview
- PRTH income statement
- PRTH valuation and score
- SEZL stock overview
- SEZL income statement
- SEZL valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.