StockData

Pursuit Attractions & Hospitality vs Vivid Seats

PRSU and SEAT side by side, both in miscellaneous amusement and recreation. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How PRSU and SEAT compare

Pursuit Attractions & Hospitality is the larger company, worth 95 times as much as Vivid Seats ($1.5B against $16.0M).

Pursuit Attractions & Hospitality grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (11.9% versus −23.4% for Vivid Seats).

Pursuit Attractions & Hospitality scores higher on the StockData Score (16 against 4 for Vivid Seats), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricPRSUSEAT
Size and price
Market cap$1.5B$16.0M
Share price$55.83$1.42
Change, 1 year64.6%−86.9%
Change, 5 years16.0%−99.4%
Beta (5Y)1.241.40
Employees2,100565
StockData Score
Total score16 (better)4
Valuation score4 (better)3
Growth score5 (better)1
Performance score2 (better)0
Health score5 (better)0
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/E33.2×–
P/S3.1×0.0× (better)
P/B2.4×–
EV/EBITDA12.0×–
PEG2.37–
FCF yield−1.4% (better)−441%
Fair value$64.25$58.57
Margin of safety13.1%97.6% (better)
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)11.9% (better)−23.4%
Revenue growth, 5Y average1.7%80.9% (better)
Net income growth (TTM)−87.0%–
EPS growth (TTM)−87.1%–
Profitability
Gross margin92.6%–
Net margin9.6%–
FCF margin−4.4% (better)−17.7%
Return on equity7.7%–
Financial health
Debt / equity0.21–
Net debt / EBITDA0.51–
Current ratio1.66 (better)0.47
Altman Z-score4.33 (better)−3.04
Piotroski F-score5 (better)2
Dividends and buybacks
Buyback yield2.8% (better)0.02%
Shareholder yield2.8% (better)0.02%
Ownership
Held by institutions107%80.3%
Held by insiders26.8%–
Insider net buying, 12 months$0 (better)−$2.5K
Short interest, % of float8.0%–

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.