Purple Innovation vs Somnigroup International
PRPL and SGI side by side, both in consumer discretionary. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How PRPL and SGI compare
Somnigroup International is the larger company, worth 1022 times as much as Purple Innovation ($13.4B against $13.1M).
Somnigroup International grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (27.1% versus −0.74% for Purple Innovation).
Somnigroup International keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 7.0% compared with −10.7% at Purple Innovation.
Somnigroup International pays a dividend yielding 1.0%; Purple Innovation does not pay one.
Somnigroup International scores higher on the StockData Score (12 against 3 for Purple Innovation), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | PRPL | SGI |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $13.1M | $13.4B |
| Share price | $3.00 | $63.56 |
| Change, 1 year | −85.8% | −22.2% |
| Change, 5 years | −99.4% | 41.0% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.51 | 1.22 |
| Employees | 1,100 | 19K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 3 | 12 (better) |
| Valuation score | 1 | 1 |
| Growth score | 1 | 4 (better) |
| Performance score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Health score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 4 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 25.4× |
| P/S | 0.0× (better) | 1.8× |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 14.1× |
| P/FCF | – | 17.4× |
| FCF yield | −73.0% | 5.8% (better) |
| Fair value | – | $45.44 |
| Margin of safety | – | −39.9% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −0.74% | 27.1% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | −6.3% | 15.3% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | 99.1% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | 74.8% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | 2.3% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 41.8% | 44.2% (better) |
| Operating margin | −7.8% | 12.5% (better) |
| Net margin | −10.7% | 7.0% (better) |
| FCF margin | −2.1% | 10.1% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | 3.43 |
| Interest coverage | −1.1× | 3.8× (better) |
| Current ratio | 0.52 | 0.75 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | −2.67 | 1.84 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 | 6 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 1.0% |
| Payout ratio | – | 25.4% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 4 |
| Buyback yield | – | 0.19% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 1.2% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 56.9% | 107% |
| Held by insiders | – | 3.7% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $29.4K | $4.4M (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | – | 3 |
| Short interest, % of float | – | 9.3% |
Go deeper
- PRPL stock overview
- PRPL income statement
- PRPL valuation and score
- SGI stock overview
- SGI income statement
- SGI valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.