United Parks & Resorts vs Rush Street Interactive
PRKS and RSI side by side, both in miscellaneous amusement and recreation. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How PRKS and RSI compare
Rush Street Interactive is the larger company, worth 1.5 times as much as United Parks & Resorts ($2.7B against $1.8B).
On earnings, United Parks & Resorts is cheaper: it trades at 15.0× trailing earnings, against 39.5× for Rush Street Interactive.
Rush Street Interactive grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (38.7% versus −1.9% for United Parks & Resorts).
United Parks & Resorts keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 7.6% compared with 2.6% at Rush Street Interactive.
Rush Street Interactive scores higher on the StockData Score (16 against 7 for United Parks & Resorts), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | PRKS | RSI |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $1.8B | $2.7B |
| Share price | $40.10 | $11.86 |
| Change, 1 year | 19.3% | −31.7% |
| Change, 5 years | −39.7% | −43.7% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.04 | 1.60 |
| Employees | 3,300 | 912 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 7 | 16 (better) |
| Valuation score | 5 (better) | 2 |
| Growth score | 0 | 4 (better) |
| Performance score | 2 | 4 (better) |
| Health score | 0 | 6 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 15.0× (better) | 39.5× |
| P/S | 1.1× (better) | 1.9× |
| P/B | – | 14.0× |
| EV/EBITDA | 8.3× (better) | 12.3× |
| P/FCF | 12.1× (better) | 13.0× |
| FCF yield | 8.3% (better) | 7.7% |
| Fair value | $62.61 | $12.71 |
| Margin of safety | 36.0% (better) | 6.7% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −1.9% | 38.7% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 30.9% | 32.4% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −31.4% | 25.3% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −18.3% | 20.0% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | – | 35.5% |
| Operating margin | 18.6% (better) | 10.9% |
| Net margin | 7.6% (better) | 2.6% |
| FCF margin | 9.2% | 14.3% (better) |
| Return on equity | – | 23.0% |
| Return on invested capital | 12.9% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 0.00 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 4.59 | – |
| Interest coverage | 2.4× | – |
| Current ratio | 0.55 | 2.22 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 1.75 | 6.18 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 | 7 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Buyback yield | 20.0% (better) | 0.49% |
| Shareholder yield | 20.0% (better) | 0.49% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 134% | 54.7% |
| Held by insiders | 63.7% | 54.8% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$881K (better) | −$361M |
| Short interest, % of float | 30.2% | 8.2% |
Go deeper
- PRKS stock overview
- PRKS income statement
- PRKS valuation and score
- RSI stock overview
- RSI income statement
- RSI valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.