Park National vs Trustmark
PRK and TRMK side by side, both in commercial banks. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How PRK and TRMK compare
Park National is the larger company, worth 1.2 times as much as Trustmark ($3.2B against $2.6B).
On earnings, Trustmark is cheaper: it trades at 11.4× trailing earnings, against 15.7× for Park National.
Park National grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (17.9% versus 3.8% for Trustmark).
Trustmark keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 28.6% compared with 25.7% at Park National.
Both pay dividends: Park National yields 3.1% and Trustmark 2.2%.
Trustmark scores higher on the StockData Score (15 against 12 for Park National), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | PRK | TRMK |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $3.2B | $2.6B |
| Share price | $178.86 | $45.56 |
| Change, 1 year | 13.8% | 18.9% |
| Change, 5 years | 27.7% | 39.2% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.62 | 0.68 |
| Employees | 1,731 | 2,543 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 12 | 15 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 5 (better) |
| Growth score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Performance score | 3 | 3 |
| Health score | 5 (better) | 2 |
| Dividend score | 2 | 4 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 15.7× | 11.4× (better) |
| P/S | 4.1× | 3.2× (better) |
| P/B | 1.9× | 1.3× (better) |
| P/FCF | 16.8× | 10.2× (better) |
| PEG | 2.23 | 0.24 (better) |
| FCF yield | 5.9% | 9.8% (better) |
| Fair value | $139.41 | $45.64 |
| Margin of safety | −28.3% | 0.17% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 17.9% (better) | 3.8% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 7.9% (better) | 2.7% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 13.6% (better) | 5.8% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 4.8% | 9.3% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 7.3% | 8.1% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Net margin | 25.7% | 28.6% (better) |
| FCF margin | 24.6% | 31.5% (better) |
| Return on equity | 11.7% (better) | 11.2% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.08 | – |
| Altman Z-score | 0.37 (better) | 0.30 |
| Piotroski F-score | 7 (better) | 6 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 3.1% (better) | 2.2% |
| Payout ratio | – | 24.9% |
| Years of dividend growth | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 5.3% (better) | 0.85% |
| Buyback yield | – | 3.9% |
| Shareholder yield | 3.1% | 6.1% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 53.6% | 80.7% |
| Held by insiders | 2.7% | 1.9% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | – | −$24.2K |
| Short interest, % of float | 4.4% | 6.0% |
Go deeper
- PRK stock overview
- PRK income statement
- PRK valuation and score
- TRMK stock overview
- TRMK income statement
- TRMK valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.