Primoris Services vs Tutor Perini
PRIM and TPC side by side. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How PRIM and TPC compare
Tutor Perini is the larger company, worth 1.4 times as much as Primoris Services ($5.3B against $3.9B).
On earnings, Tutor Perini is cheaper: it trades at 38.4× trailing earnings, against 40.8× for Primoris Services.
Tutor Perini grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (22.6% versus −5.4% for Primoris Services).
Tutor Perini keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 2.3% compared with 1.4% at Primoris Services.
Both pay dividends: Primoris Services yields 0.44% and Tutor Perini 0.27%.
Tutor Perini scores higher on the StockData Score (16 against 9 for Primoris Services), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | PRIM | TPC |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $3.9B | $5.3B |
| Share price | $72.22 | $101.34 |
| Change, 1 year | −44.0% | 58.4% |
| Change, 5 years | 187% | 616% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.28 | 1.24 |
| Employees | 3,055 | 7,400 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 9 | 16 (better) |
| Valuation score | 1 | 1 |
| Growth score | 2 | 4 (better) |
| Performance score | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Health score | 1 | 5 (better) |
| Dividend score | 4 (better) | 3 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 40.8× | 38.4× (better) |
| P/S | 0.6× (better) | 0.9× |
| P/B | 2.5× (better) | 4.1× |
| EV/EBITDA | 15.8× | 11.8× (better) |
| P/FCF | 103× | 7.9× (better) |
| PEG | 1.53 | – |
| FCF yield | 0.97% | 12.6% (better) |
| Fair value | $48.52 | $66.28 |
| Margin of safety | −48.8% (better) | −52.9% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −5.4% | 22.6% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 16.8% (better) | 0.83% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −65.2% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −65.1% | – |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 18.4% (better) | −6.6% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 8.5% | 11.8% (better) |
| Operating margin | 2.4% | 5.6% (better) |
| Net margin | 1.4% | 2.3% (better) |
| FCF margin | 0.53% | 10.8% (better) |
| Return on equity | 6.0% | 11.3% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 6.3% | 36.0% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.50 | 0.31 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 2.05 (better) | −1.78 |
| Interest coverage | – | 7.4× |
| Current ratio | 1.14 | 1.27 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 2.90 (better) | 2.26 |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 | 7 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 0.44% (better) | 0.27% |
| Payout ratio | 18.1% | 10.2% |
| Years of dividend growth | 2 (better) | 0 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 5.9% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 0.44% (better) | 0.27% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 102% | 80.3% |
| Held by insiders | 1.1% | 10.6% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$6.5M (better) | −$216M |
| Superinvestors holding | – | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | 8.8% | 3.9% |
Go deeper
- PRIM stock overview
- PRIM income statement
- PRIM valuation and score
- TPC stock overview
- TPC income statement
- TPC valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.