Power Integrations vs Silicon Laboratories
POWI and SLAB side by side, both in electronic components and accessories. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How POWI and SLAB compare
Silicon Laboratories is the larger company, worth 3.0 times as much as Power Integrations ($7.4B against $2.5B).
Silicon Laboratories grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (21.3% versus 2.3% for Power Integrations).
Power Integrations keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 9.8% compared with −2.3% at Silicon Laboratories.
Power Integrations pays a dividend yielding 1.9%; Silicon Laboratories does not pay one.
Power Integrations scores higher on the StockData Score (13 against 7 for Silicon Laboratories), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | POWI | SLAB |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $2.5B | $7.4B |
| Share price | $44.18 | $221.43 |
| Change, 1 year | 23.9% | 74.4% |
| Change, 5 years | −58.6% | 7.9% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.37 | 1.36 |
| Employees | 877 | 1,930 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 13 (better) | 7 |
| Valuation score | 2 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Performance score | 2 (better) | 0 |
| Health score | 6 (better) | 5 |
| Dividend score | 2 (better) | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 55.9× | – |
| P/S | 5.4× (better) | 8.2× |
| P/B | 3.5× (better) | 6.6× |
| EV/EBITDA | 57.0× | – |
| P/FCF | 27.0× (better) | 1041× |
| FCF yield | 3.7% (better) | 0.10% |
| Fair value | $33.61 | $128.32 |
| Margin of safety | −31.5% (better) | −72.6% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 2.3% | 21.3% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | −1.9% | 9.0% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 149% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 155% | – |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | −19.7% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 53.9% | 61.3% (better) |
| Operating margin | 8.4% (better) | −2.6% |
| Net margin | 9.8% (better) | −2.3% |
| FCF margin | 20.0% (better) | 0.79% |
| Return on equity | 6.5% (better) | −1.9% |
| Return on invested capital | 8.6% (better) | −2.2% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Interest coverage | – | −25.0× |
| Current ratio | 7.88 (better) | 4.60 |
| Altman Z-score | 18.65 | 23.12 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 7 (better) | 6 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 1.9% | – |
| Payout ratio | 106% | – |
| Buyback yield | 0.00% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 1.9% (better) | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 112% | 93.2% |
| Held by insiders | 2.7% | 2.2% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$30.2M | −$4.2M (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 8.7% | 5.2% |
Go deeper
- POWI stock overview
- POWI income statement
- POWI valuation and score
- SLAB stock overview
- SLAB income statement
- SLAB valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.