Pennant vs Sonida Senior Living
PNTG and SNDA side by side, both in health services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How PNTG and SNDA compare
Pennant and Sonida Senior Living are about the same size, with market caps of $1.5B and $1.6B.
Sonida Senior Living grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (49.4% versus 37.9% for Pennant).
Pennant keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 2.9% compared with −23.3% at Sonida Senior Living.
Pennant scores higher on the StockData Score (10 against 4 for Sonida Senior Living), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | PNTG | SNDA |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $1.5B | $1.6B |
| Share price | $41.66 | $34.30 |
| Change, 1 year | 66.4% | 33.3% |
| Change, 5 years | 75.0% | 21.2% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.03 | 0.60 |
| Employees | 9,700 | 5,140 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 10 (better) | 4 |
| Valuation score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Growth score | 4 (better) | 2 |
| Performance score | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Health score | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 46.3× | – |
| P/S | 1.3× (better) | 3.1× |
| P/B | – | 1.9× |
| EV/EBITDA | 20.6× (better) | 128× |
| P/FCF | 42.0× | – |
| PEG | 0.82 | – |
| FCF yield | 2.4% (better) | −3.2% |
| Fair value | $33.43 | $37.39 |
| Margin of safety | −24.6% | 8.3% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 37.9% | 49.4% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 19.4% (better) | −0.14% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 20.5% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 15.4% | – |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 10.1% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 18.5% | – |
| Operating margin | 5.6% | – |
| Net margin | 2.9% (better) | −23.3% |
| FCF margin | 3.1% (better) | −10.0% |
| Return on equity | – | −26.7% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 1.82 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | −0.14 | 61.23 (better) |
| Interest coverage | 5.8× | – |
| Current ratio | 1.20 (better) | 0.88 |
| Altman Z-score | 2.82 (better) | 0.48 |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 (better) | 2 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Buyback yield | – | −6.6% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% (better) | −6.6% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 92.7% | 78.4% |
| Held by insiders | 5.0% | 64.4% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$690K | $89.0M (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 3.6% | 20.6% |
Go deeper
- PNTG stock overview
- PNTG income statement
- PNTG valuation and score
- SNDA stock overview
- SNDA income statement
- SNDA valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.