StockData

PMA Graphene Technology vs WF International

PMA and WXM side by side, both in construction special trade contractors. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How PMA and WXM compare

WF International grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (−13.7% versus −56.8% for PMA Graphene Technology).

WF International keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −24.5% compared with −39.4% at PMA Graphene Technology.

WF International scores higher on the StockData Score (2 against 0 for PMA Graphene Technology), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricPMAWXM
Size and price
Share price$1.36$2.68
Change, 1 year−27.7%−54.6%
Beta (5Y)1.092.02
Employees728
StockData Score
Total score02 (better)
Valuation score00
Growth score00
Performance score00
Health score02 (better)
Dividend score00
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)−56.8%−13.7% (better)
Net income growth (TTM)–−442%
EPS growth (TTM)–−394%
Profitability
Gross margin−18.4%8.8% (better)
Operating margin−37.4%−21.4% (better)
Net margin−39.4%−24.5% (better)
Return on equity–−66.8%
Return on invested capital−53.4% (better)−93.3%
Financial health
Debt / equity–0.11
Interest coverage−15.8×–
Current ratio0.711.31 (better)
Piotroski F-score22
Ownership
Held by institutions0.77%–
Held by insiders68.1%–
Insider net buying, 12 months−$1.7M–
Short interest, % of float2.5%–

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.