Plexus vs TTM Technologies
PLXS and TTMI side by side, both in electronic components and accessories. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How PLXS and TTMI compare
TTM Technologies is the larger company, worth 1.6 times as much as Plexus ($8.7B against $5.5B).
On earnings, Plexus is cheaper: it trades at 30.7× trailing earnings, against 37.4× for TTM Technologies.
TTM Technologies grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (27.6% versus 1.8% for Plexus).
TTM Technologies keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 7.0% compared with 4.6% at Plexus.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | PLXS | TTMI |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $5.5B | $8.7B |
| Share price | $207.96 | $82.94 |
| Change, 1 year | 49.1% | 30.6% |
| Change, 5 years | 120% | 480% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.90 | 1.66 |
| Employees | 20K | 18K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 13 | 13 |
| Valuation score | 2 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 3 | 4 (better) |
| Performance score | 5 (better) | 4 |
| Health score | 3 | 5 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 30.7× (better) | 37.4× |
| P/S | 1.4× (better) | 2.6× |
| P/B | 3.6× (better) | 4.5× |
| EV/EBITDA | 17.0× (better) | 27.5× |
| P/FCF | 89.6× | – |
| PEG | 3.48 | 1.65 (better) |
| FCF yield | 1.1% (better) | −0.17% |
| Fair value | $182.17 | $69.83 |
| Margin of safety | −14.2% (better) | −18.8% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 1.8% | 27.6% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 2.9% | 6.7% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 14.0% | 154% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 15.5% | 147% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 9.8% (better) | 0.12% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 11.4% | 21.2% (better) |
| Operating margin | 5.7% | 9.9% (better) |
| Net margin | 4.6% | 7.0% (better) |
| FCF margin | 1.5% (better) | −0.45% |
| Return on equity | 12.6% | 13.3% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 16.6% (better) | 13.3% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 0.50 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | 1.39 |
| Interest coverage | 18.0× (better) | 7.6× |
| Current ratio | 1.49 | 1.78 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 4.03 (better) | 3.76 |
| Piotroski F-score | 9 (better) | 7 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Buyback yield | 1.5% (better) | 0.00% |
| Shareholder yield | 1.5% (better) | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 101% | 92.6% |
| Held by insiders | 1.4% | 2.4% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$23.7M (better) | −$34.8M |
| Superinvestors holding | – | 3 |
| Short interest, % of float | 3.5% | 4.0% |
Go deeper
- PLXS stock overview
- PLXS income statement
- PLXS valuation and score
- TTMI stock overview
- TTMI income statement
- TTMI valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.