Planet Fitness vs Rush Street Interactive
PLNT and RSI side by side, both in miscellaneous amusement and recreation. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How PLNT and RSI compare
Planet Fitness is the larger company, worth 1.4 times as much as Rush Street Interactive ($4.0B against $2.8B).
Rush Street Interactive grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (38.7% versus 12.7% for Planet Fitness).
Planet Fitness keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 16.9% compared with 2.6% at Rush Street Interactive.
Rush Street Interactive scores higher on the StockData Score (16 against 9 for Planet Fitness), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | PLNT | RSI |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $4.0B | $2.8B |
| Share price | $53.58 | $12.12 |
| Change, 1 year | −41.4% | −33.3% |
| Change, 5 years | −44.0% | −38.7% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.80 | 1.59 |
| Employees | 4,020 | 912 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 9 | 16 (better) |
| Valuation score | 2 | 2 |
| Growth score | 3 | 4 (better) |
| Performance score | 3 | 4 (better) |
| Health score | 1 | 6 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 40.4× |
| P/S | 2.9× | 1.9× (better) |
| P/B | – | 14.4× |
| EV/EBITDA | 10.4× (better) | 12.6× |
| P/FCF | 15.5× | 13.3× (better) |
| FCF yield | 6.5% | 7.5% (better) |
| Fair value | $59.31 | $13.01 |
| Margin of safety | 9.7% (better) | 6.8% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 12.7% | 38.7% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 26.6% | 32.4% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 25.9% (better) | 25.3% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | 20.0% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 81.7% (better) | 35.5% |
| Operating margin | 30.9% (better) | 10.9% |
| Net margin | 16.9% (better) | 2.6% |
| FCF margin | 18.6% (better) | 14.3% |
| Return on equity | – | 23.0% |
| Return on invested capital | 20.7% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 0.00 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 3.61 | – |
| Interest coverage | 3.6× | – |
| Current ratio | 1.58 | 2.22 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 1.13 | 6.28 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 | 7 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Buyback yield | 17.2% (better) | 0.48% |
| Shareholder yield | 17.2% (better) | 0.48% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 115% | 54.4% |
| Held by insiders | 0.67% | 54.5% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $732K (better) | −$360M |
| Short interest, % of float | 12.8% | 9.6% |
Go deeper
- PLNT stock overview
- PLNT income statement
- PLNT valuation and score
- RSI stock overview
- RSI income statement
- RSI valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.