StockData

Pelagos Insurance Capital vs White Mountains Insurance

PLGO and WTM side by side, both in fire, marine, and casualty insurance. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How PLGO and WTM compare

White Mountains Insurance grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (44.9% versus −3.6% for Pelagos Insurance Capital).

White Mountains Insurance pays a dividend yielding 0.04%; Pelagos Insurance Capital does not pay one.

White Mountains Insurance scores higher on the StockData Score (15 against 2 for Pelagos Insurance Capital), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricPLGOWTM
Size and price
Market cap–$5.4B
Share price$28.78$2254.95
Change, 1 year50.4%16.6%
Change, 5 years–114%
Beta (5Y)0.400.24
Employees1081,648
StockData Score
Total score215 (better)
Valuation score05 (better)
Growth score23 (better)
Performance score04 (better)
Health score00
Dividend score03 (better)
Valuation
P/E–6.0×
P/S–1.5×
P/B–1.0×
EV/EBITDA–4.9×
PEG–0.38
Fair value–$3223.04
Margin of safety–30.0%
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)−3.6%44.9% (better)
Revenue growth, 5Y average–33.1%
Net income growth (TTM)–591%
EPS growth (TTM)–596%
EPS growth, 5Y average–13.6%
Profitability
Gross margin–92.8%
Net margin–26.9%
FCF margin25.1%–
Return on equity–19.2%
Financial health
Altman Z-score–1.22
Piotroski F-score–5
Dividends and buybacks
Dividend yield–0.04%
Payout ratio–0.25%
Years of dividend growth2 (better)0
Dividend growth, 5Y average–0.00%
Buyback yield–7.6%
Shareholder yield–7.7%
Ownership
Held by institutions69.0%92.3%
Held by insiders16.4%2.7%
Insider net buying, 12 months–−$20.8M
Superinvestors holding11
Short interest, % of float2.9%5.6%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.