Dave & Buster's Entertainment vs Red Robin Gourmet Burgers
PLAY and RRGB side by side, both in eating and drinking places. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How PLAY and RRGB compare
Dave & Buster's Entertainment is the larger company, worth 1.6 times as much as Red Robin Gourmet Burgers ($273M against $172M).
Dave & Buster's Entertainment grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (−1.5% versus −3.7% for Red Robin Gourmet Burgers).
Red Robin Gourmet Burgers keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −2.5% compared with −4.3% at Dave & Buster's Entertainment.
Dave & Buster's Entertainment scores higher on the StockData Score (5 against 4 for Red Robin Gourmet Burgers), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | PLAY | RRGB |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $273M | $172M |
| Share price | $7.83 | $9.11 |
| Change, 1 year | −51.3% | 69.3% |
| Change, 5 years | −80.6% | −59.5% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.33 | 2.05 |
| Employees | 24K | 19K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 5 (better) | 4 |
| Valuation score | 4 (better) | 2 |
| Growth score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Performance score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Health score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/S | 0.1× (better) | 0.1× |
| P/B | 3.1× | – |
| EV/EBITDA | 5.3× (better) | 7.0× |
| FCF yield | −5.9% | −1.0% (better) |
| Fair value | $37.67 | – |
| Margin of safety | 79.2% | – |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −1.5% (better) | −3.7% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 36.9% (better) | 6.9% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −1013% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −853% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 85.4% | – |
| Operating margin | 1.7% (better) | −0.37% |
| Net margin | −4.3% | −2.5% (better) |
| FCF margin | −0.77% | −0.15% (better) |
| Return on equity | −69.7% | – |
| Return on invested capital | 1.7% (better) | −8.0% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 17.15 | – |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 4.50 | 3.14 (better) |
| Interest coverage | 0.2× (better) | −0.2× |
| Current ratio | 0.30 | 0.71 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 0.69 | 1.80 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 (better) | 4 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Buyback yield | 0.00% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 119% | 51.2% |
| Held by insiders | 26.3% | 34.4% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $101K (better) | −$68.0K |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 37.9% | 14.4% |
Go deeper
- PLAY stock overview
- PLAY income statement
- PLAY valuation and score
- RRGB stock overview
- RRGB income statement
- RRGB valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.