StockData

Planet Green vs Top Wealth

PLAG and TWG side by side, both in food and kindred products. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How PLAG and TWG compare

Planet Green grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (160% versus 92.3% for Top Wealth).

Top Wealth keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 34.9% compared with −308% at Planet Green.

Top Wealth scores higher on the StockData Score (7 against 3 for Planet Green), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricPLAGTWG
Size and price
Market cap$5.4M–
Share price$0.380$2.53
Change, 1 year−77.7%−99.5%
Change, 5 years−96.9%–
Beta (5Y)0.45–
Employees452
StockData Score
Total score37 (better)
Valuation score1 (better)0
Growth score22
Performance score03 (better)
Health score02 (better)
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S0.6×–
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)160% (better)92.3%
Revenue growth, 5Y average−3.5%–
Profitability
Gross margin10.2%74.6% (better)
Operating margin−202%–
Net margin−308%34.9% (better)
Return on equity−258%13.8% (better)
Return on invested capital−134%–
Financial health
Debt / equity–0.01
Interest coverage−117.2×–
Current ratio0.3010.66 (better)
Altman Z-score−49.46–
Piotroski F-score35 (better)
Dividends and buybacks
Shareholder yield0.00%–
Ownership
Held by institutions0.31%3.1%
Held by insiders18.2%0.00%
Short interest, % of float0.78%2.7%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.