StockData

Planet Labs PBC vs Satellogic

PL and SATL side by side, both in communications equipment. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How PL and SATL compare

Satellogic grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (202% versus 44.1% for Planet Labs PBC).

Planet Labs PBC keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −95.1% compared with −180% at Satellogic.

Satellogic scores higher on the StockData Score (8 against 4 for Planet Labs PBC), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricPLSATL
Size and price
Market cap$5.2B–
Share price$14.34$3.80
Change, 1 year7.1%138%
Change, 5 years25.8%−61.9%
Beta (5Y)2.020.72
Employees1,000154
StockData Score
Total score48 (better)
Valuation score00
Growth score33
Performance score00
Health score15 (better)
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S13.8×–
P/B9.2×–
P/FCF211×–
FCF yield0.47%–
Fair value$3.87–
Margin of safety−270%–
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)44.1%202% (better)
Revenue growth, 5Y average22.1%–
Profitability
Gross margin55.4%79.5% (better)
Operating margin−27.2% (better)−35.0%
Net margin−95.1% (better)−180%
FCF margin6.5% (better)−111%
Return on equity−72.0% (better)−2461%
Financial health
Debt / equity–0.00
Interest coverage−18.7×–
Current ratio2.844.90 (better)
Altman Z-score2.62–
Piotroski F-score45 (better)
Dividends and buybacks
Shareholder yield0.00%–
Ownership
Held by institutions70.5%72.6%
Held by insiders9.7%61.3%
Insider net buying, 12 months−$43.1M (better)−$104M
Short interest, % of float11.1%–

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.