Park Aerospace vs SIFCO Industries
PKE and SIF side by side, both in aircraft and parts. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How PKE and SIF compare
Park Aerospace is the larger company, worth 5.5 times as much as SIFCO Industries ($536M against $98.1M).
On earnings, SIFCO Industries is cheaper: it trades at 24.5× trailing earnings, against 33.8× for Park Aerospace.
Park Aerospace grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (27.7% versus 18.8% for SIFCO Industries).
Park Aerospace keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 18.4% compared with 4.0% at SIFCO Industries.
Park Aerospace pays a dividend yielding 2.1%; SIFCO Industries does not pay one.
Park Aerospace scores higher on the StockData Score (19 against 13 for SIFCO Industries), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | PKE | SIF |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $536M | $98.1M |
| Share price | $24.33 | $15.68 |
| Change, 1 year | 24.9% | 131% |
| Change, 5 years | 72.9% | 106% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.72 | 0.71 |
| Employees | 125 | 244 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 19 (better) | 13 |
| Valuation score | 1 | 4 (better) |
| Growth score | 4 (better) | 2 |
| Performance score | 5 (better) | 2 |
| Health score | 6 (better) | 5 |
| Dividend score | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 33.8× | 24.5× (better) |
| P/S | 6.6× | 1.0× (better) |
| P/B | 3.3× | 2.4× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 22.3× | 11.7× (better) |
| P/FCF | 46.8× | 29.0× (better) |
| PEG | 13.51 | – |
| FCF yield | 2.1% | 3.5% (better) |
| Fair value | $21.07 | $17.68 |
| Margin of safety | −15.4% | 11.3% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 27.7% (better) | 18.8% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 9.6% (better) | −5.7% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 103% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 100% | – |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 18.5% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 32.7% (better) | 16.6% |
| Operating margin | 21.1% (better) | 5.2% |
| Net margin | 18.4% (better) | 4.0% |
| FCF margin | 14.2% (better) | 3.4% |
| Return on equity | 11.1% (better) | 10.3% |
| Return on invested capital | 29.1% (better) | 9.1% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | 0.29 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | 1.26 |
| Interest coverage | – | 3.8× |
| Current ratio | 22.75 (better) | 1.77 |
| Altman Z-score | 27.37 (better) | 3.65 |
| Piotroski F-score | 8 (better) | 5 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 2.1% | – |
| Payout ratio | 69.4% | – |
| Buyback yield | 0.00% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 2.1% (better) | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 88.6% | 28.2% |
| Held by insiders | 4.3% | 17.8% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$9.4M | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 6.4% | 5.7% |
Go deeper
- PKE stock overview
- PKE income statement
- PKE valuation and score
- SIF stock overview
- SIF income statement
- SIF valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.