Park Hotels & Resorts vs Xenia Hotels & Resorts
PK and XHR side by side, both in hotels and motels. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How PK and XHR compare
Park Hotels & Resorts is the larger company, worth 1.8 times as much as Xenia Hotels & Resorts ($3.3B against $1.9B).
Xenia Hotels & Resorts grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (1.6% versus −1.4% for Park Hotels & Resorts).
Xenia Hotels & Resorts keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −0.66% compared with −6.4% at Park Hotels & Resorts.
Both pay dividends: Park Hotels & Resorts yields 6.0% and Xenia Hotels & Resorts 2.7%.
Xenia Hotels & Resorts scores higher on the StockData Score (5 against 4 for Park Hotels & Resorts), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | PK | XHR |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $3.3B | $1.9B |
| Share price | $16.60 | $20.45 |
| Change, 1 year | 51.3% | 59.1% |
| Change, 5 years | −21.4% | 1.6% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.14 | 1.10 |
| Employees | 90 | 42 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 4 | 5 (better) |
| Valuation score | 1 | 1 |
| Growth score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Performance score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Health score | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend score | 3 (better) | 1 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/S | 1.3× (better) | 1.7× |
| P/B | 1.1× (better) | 1.7× |
| EV/EBITDA | 9.2× | 9.1× (better) |
| P/FCF | 41.3× | – |
| FCF yield | 2.4% | – |
| Fair value | $13.32 | $18.85 |
| Margin of safety | −24.6% | −8.5% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −1.4% | 1.6% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 24.4% (better) | 23.9% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −381% | −111% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −404% | −113% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | – | 30.8% |
| Operating margin | 2.0% | 6.7% (better) |
| Net margin | −6.4% | −0.66% (better) |
| FCF margin | 3.2% | – |
| Return on equity | −5.0% | −0.62% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 1.4% | 5.7% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Interest coverage | 0.3× | 0.9× (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 0.61 | 0.86 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | 8 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 6.0% (better) | 2.7% |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 17.3% (better) | 15.3% |
| Buyback yield | 0.00% | 2.6% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | 6.0% (better) | 5.3% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 107% | 95.5% |
| Held by insiders | 3.0% | 0.73% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $33.0K (better) | −$5.6M |
| Short interest, % of float | 16.8% | 4.1% |
Go deeper
- PK stock overview
- PK income statement
- PK valuation and score
- XHR stock overview
- XHR income statement
- XHR valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.