Phreesia vs Priority Technology
PHR and PRTH side by side, both in miscellaneous business services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How PHR and PRTH compare
Phreesia is the larger company, worth 1.2 times as much as Priority Technology ($795M against $651M).
On earnings, Priority Technology is cheaper: it trades at 16.1× trailing earnings, against 75.4× for Phreesia.
Phreesia grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (12.9% versus 10.1% for Priority Technology).
Priority Technology scores higher on the StockData Score (9 against 8 for Phreesia), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | PHR | PRTH |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $795M | $651M |
| Share price | $12.81 | $7.90 |
| Change, 1 year | −43.4% | 41.8% |
| Change, 5 years | −81.1% | 28.5% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.53 | 1.01 |
| Employees | 1,789 | 1,200 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 8 | 9 (better) |
| Valuation score | 1 | 4 (better) |
| Growth score | 3 | 3 |
| Performance score | 1 | 1 |
| Health score | 3 (better) | 1 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 75.4× | 16.1× (better) |
| P/S | 1.6× | 0.6× (better) |
| P/B | 2.1× | – |
| EV/EBITDA | 15.8× | 7.4× (better) |
| P/FCF | 9.8× | 6.0× (better) |
| FCF yield | 10.2% | 16.7% (better) |
| Fair value | $9.74 | $13.98 |
| Margin of safety | −31.6% | 43.5% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 12.9% (better) | 10.1% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 26.4% (better) | 18.7% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | −7.5% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | 12.3% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 85.4% (better) | 39.1% |
| Operating margin | 2.5% | 13.2% (better) |
| Net margin | 2.1% | – |
| FCF margin | 15.9% (better) | 10.6% |
| Return on equity | 3.1% | – |
| Return on invested capital | 4.4% | 12.7% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.18 | – |
| Net debt / EBITDA | −0.16 | 4.30 (better) |
| Interest coverage | 1.2× | 1.6× (better) |
| Current ratio | 1.76 (better) | 1.10 |
| Altman Z-score | 1.07 (better) | 0.74 |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 | – |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 94.0% | 23.6% |
| Held by insiders | 22.7% | 59.7% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $26.8M (better) | −$23.8K |
| Short interest, % of float | 6.3% | – |
Go deeper
- PHR stock overview
- PHR income statement
- PHR valuation and score
- PRTH stock overview
- PRTH income statement
- PRTH valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.