StockData

Phoenix Asia vs WF International

PHOE and WXM side by side, both in construction special trade contractors. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How PHOE and WXM compare

Phoenix Asia grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (−2.2% versus −13.7% for WF International).

Phoenix Asia keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −16.7% compared with −24.5% at WF International.

Phoenix Asia scores higher on the StockData Score (5 against 2 for WF International), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricPHOEWXM
Size and price
Share price$15.79$2.68
Change, 1 year−5.3%−54.6%
Beta (5Y)0.092.02
Employees3228
StockData Score
Total score5 (better)2
Valuation score00
Growth score1 (better)0
Performance score00
Health score4 (better)2
Dividend score00
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)−2.2% (better)−13.7%
Net income growth (TTM)−217% (better)−442%
EPS growth (TTM)−200% (better)−394%
Profitability
Gross margin4.6%8.8% (better)
Operating margin−16.8% (better)−21.4%
Net margin−16.7% (better)−24.5%
Return on equity−25.9% (better)−66.8%
Return on invested capital−31.9% (better)−93.3%
Financial health
Debt / equity0.000.11 (better)
Interest coverage−487.7×–
Current ratio5.46 (better)1.31
Piotroski F-score22
Ownership
Held by insiders74.5%–
Short interest, % of float0.02%–

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.