Phinia vs Visteon
PHIN and VC side by side, both in motor vehicles and motor vehicle equipment. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How PHIN and VC compare
Phinia is the larger company, worth 1.3 times as much as Visteon ($2.6B against $2.0B).
On earnings, Visteon is cheaper: it trades at 13.8× trailing earnings, against 14.5× for Phinia.
Phinia grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (5.6% versus 1.9% for Visteon).
Phinia keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 5.2% compared with 4.1% at Visteon.
Both pay dividends: Phinia yields 1.6% and Visteon 1.7%.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | PHIN | VC |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $2.6B | $2.0B |
| Share price | $72.08 | $80.07 |
| Change, 1 year | 33.7% | −25.3% |
| Change, 5 years | – | −33.7% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.90 | 0.85 |
| Employees | 13K | 11K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 16 | 16 |
| Valuation score | 4 | 6 (better) |
| Growth score | 3 (better) | 1 |
| Performance score | 4 (better) | 2 |
| Health score | 2 | 5 (better) |
| Dividend score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 14.5× | 13.8× (better) |
| P/S | 0.7× | 0.5× (better) |
| P/B | 1.7× | 1.4× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 7.0× | 5.9× (better) |
| P/FCF | 11.4× | – |
| PEG | – | 0.74 |
| FCF yield | 8.8% | – |
| Fair value | $82.31 | $115.26 |
| Margin of safety | 12.4% | 30.5% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 5.6% (better) | 1.9% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | – | 8.1% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 110% (better) | −36.9% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 123% (better) | −36.2% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 22.1% (better) | 10.4% |
| Operating margin | 8.3% | – |
| Net margin | 5.2% (better) | 4.1% |
| FCF margin | 6.3% | – |
| Return on equity | 12.2% (better) | 10.8% |
| Return on invested capital | 10.4% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.72 | 0.23 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 1.41 (better) | −0.41 |
| Current ratio | 1.70 (better) | 1.61 |
| Altman Z-score | 2.14 | 3.17 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 7 | 7 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 1.6% | 1.7% (better) |
| Payout ratio | 22.8% | 22.6% |
| Years of dividend growth | 2 (better) | 0 |
| Buyback yield | – | 14.5% |
| Shareholder yield | 1.6% | 16.3% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 105% | 129% |
| Held by insiders | 2.1% | 2.0% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$4.3M (better) | −$11.8M |
| Short interest, % of float | 10.7% | 16.8% |
Go deeper
- PHIN stock overview
- PHIN income statement
- PHIN valuation and score
- VC stock overview
- VC income statement
- VC valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.