StockData

Koninklijke Philips vs Smith & Nephew

PHG and SNN side by side, both in surgical, medical, and dental instruments and supplies. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How PHG and SNN compare

Smith & Nephew grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (6.1% versus −1.0% for Koninklijke Philips).

Smith & Nephew scores higher on the StockData Score (6 against 5 for Koninklijke Philips), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricPHGSNN
Size and price
Share price$27.12$29.70
Change, 1 year−0.66%−17.0%
Change, 5 years−43.2%−20.1%
Beta (5Y)0.990.63
Employees25K18K
StockData Score
Total score56 (better)
Valuation score00
Growth score11
Performance score3 (better)1
Health score14 (better)
Dividend score00
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)−1.0%6.1% (better)
Revenue growth, 5Y average0.59%6.2% (better)
EPS growth (TTM)–52.3%
EPS growth, 5Y average−6.3%6.9% (better)
Profitability
Gross margin45.2%68.0% (better)
Operating margin8.0%12.9% (better)
Net margin5.0%–
Return on equity7.8%–
Return on invested capital6.5%13.0% (better)
Financial health
Debt / equity0.740.10 (better)
Net debt / EBITDA2.08 (better)−0.31
Interest coverage4.1×5.7× (better)
Current ratio1.322.14 (better)
Dividends and buybacks
Payout ratio36.9%–
Ownership
Held by institutions5.3%4.2%
Held by insiders19.3%25.1%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.