StockData

Pharming vs Xeris Biopharma

PHAR and XERS side by side, both in drugs. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How PHAR and XERS compare

Xeris Biopharma grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (38.4% versus 26.6% for Pharming).

Pharming keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 0.76% compared with −1.8% at Xeris Biopharma.

Xeris Biopharma scores higher on the StockData Score (11 against 8 for Pharming), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricPHARXERS
Size and price
Market cap–$3.0B
Share price$13.40$16.52
Change, 1 year−23.6%114%
Change, 5 years55.5%628%
Beta (5Y)0.561.14
Employees50K435
StockData Score
Total score811 (better)
Valuation score00
Growth score24 (better)
Performance score14 (better)
Health score5 (better)3
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S–8.2×
P/B–61.7×
EV/EBITDA–63.9×
Fair value–$3.56
Margin of safety–−364%
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)26.6%38.4% (better)
Revenue growth, 5Y average12.1%70.2% (better)
EPS growth, 5Y average−40.8%–
Profitability
Gross margin87.9% (better)87.4%
Operating margin6.9%12.7% (better)
Net margin0.76% (better)−1.8%
FCF margin14.3%–
Return on equity–−27.1%
Return on invested capital–31.5%
Financial health
Debt / equity–3.89
Net debt / EBITDA–1.22
Interest coverage132× (better)1.7×
Current ratio2.59 (better)2.15
Altman Z-score–4.22
Piotroski F-score78 (better)
Dividends and buybacks
Shareholder yield–0.00%
Ownership
Held by institutions0.32%59.4%
Held by insiders0.00%5.2%
Insider net buying, 12 months–−$5.8M
Short interest, % of float–5.2%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.