StockData

Pharming vs Rhythm Pharmaceuticals

PHAR and RYTM side by side, both in drugs. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How PHAR and RYTM compare

Rhythm Pharmaceuticals grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (53.5% versus 26.6% for Pharming).

Pharming keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 0.76% compared with −85.6% at Rhythm Pharmaceuticals.

Pharming scores higher on the StockData Score (8 against 5 for Rhythm Pharmaceuticals), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricPHARRYTM
Size and price
Market cap–$7.7B
Share price$13.40$112.16
Change, 1 year−23.6%14.9%
Change, 5 years55.5%989%
Beta (5Y)0.561.41
Employees50K414
StockData Score
Total score8 (better)5
Valuation score00
Growth score22
Performance score11
Health score5 (better)2
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S–32.2×
P/B–75.0×
Fair value–$31.38
Margin of safety–−257%
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)26.6%53.5% (better)
Revenue growth, 5Y average12.1%–
EPS growth, 5Y average−40.8%–
Profitability
Gross margin87.9%89.0% (better)
Operating margin6.9% (better)−83.6%
Net margin0.76% (better)−85.6%
FCF margin14.3%–
Return on equity–−451%
Financial health
Debt / equity–1.03
Interest coverage132× (better)−10.9×
Current ratio2.593.45 (better)
Altman Z-score–16.27
Piotroski F-score7 (better)6
Dividends and buybacks
Shareholder yield–0.00%
Ownership
Held by institutions0.32%112%
Held by insiders0.00%1.1%
Insider net buying, 12 months–−$36.0M
Superinvestors holding–1
Short interest, % of float–17.1%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.