Parker-Hannifin vs Stanley Black & Decker
PH and SWK side by side. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How PH and SWK compare
Parker-Hannifin is the larger company, worth 7.3 times as much as Stanley Black & Decker ($113B against $15.6B).
On earnings, Stanley Black & Decker is cheaper: it trades at 25.2× trailing earnings, against 31.6× for Parker-Hannifin.
Parker-Hannifin grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (8.3% versus 0.57% for Stanley Black & Decker).
Both pay dividends: Parker-Hannifin yields 0.84% and Stanley Black & Decker 3.2%.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | PH | SWK |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $113B | $15.6B |
| Share price | $899.82 | $103.44 |
| Change, 1 year | 16.1% | 47.9% |
| Change, 5 years | 176% | −43.7% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.14 | 1.21 |
| Employees | 60K | 44K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 12 | 12 |
| Valuation score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Growth score | 3 | 3 |
| Performance score | 1 | 1 |
| Health score | 5 (better) | 2 |
| Dividend score | 3 | 4 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 31.6× | 25.2× (better) |
| P/S | 5.3× | 1.0× (better) |
| P/B | 7.4× | 1.7× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 23.8× | 11.7× (better) |
| P/FCF | 29.0× | 12.1× (better) |
| PEG | 1.50 | – |
| FCF yield | 3.4% | 8.3% (better) |
| Fair value | $600.32 | $99.73 |
| Margin of safety | −49.9% | −3.7% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 8.3% (better) | 0.57% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 8.4% (better) | 3.5% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | 29.7% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 5.0% | 29.7% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 16.4% (better) | −18.7% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 37.7% (better) | 31.9% |
| Operating margin | 23.6% | – |
| Net margin | – | 4.1% |
| FCF margin | 18.2% (better) | 8.5% |
| Return on equity | – | 6.9% |
| Return on invested capital | 18.8% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.49 (better) | 0.53 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 1.38 (better) | 2.47 |
| Interest coverage | 12.6× | – |
| Current ratio | 1.26 | 1.43 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 6.81 (better) | 2.30 |
| Piotroski F-score | – | 7 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 0.84% | 3.2% (better) |
| Payout ratio | – | 81.0% |
| Years of dividend growth | 9 | 17 (better) |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 15.1% (better) | 3.5% |
| Buyback yield | 1.1% | 1.7% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | 2.0% | 4.9% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 92.2% | 98.6% |
| Held by insiders | 0.20% | 0.30% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$49.7M | −$918K (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 1.2% | 4.8% |
Go deeper
- PH stock overview
- PH income statement
- PH valuation and score
- SWK stock overview
- SWK income statement
- SWK valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.