GrabAGun Digital vs Sportsman's Warehouse
PEW and SPWH side by side, both in miscellaneous retail. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How PEW and SPWH compare
GrabAGun Digital is the larger company, worth 1.4 times as much as Sportsman's Warehouse ($57.3M against $41.5M).
GrabAGun Digital grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (11.4% versus 0.84% for Sportsman's Warehouse).
Sportsman's Warehouse keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −3.9% compared with −7.0% at GrabAGun Digital.
GrabAGun Digital scores higher on the StockData Score (9 against 6 for Sportsman's Warehouse), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | PEW | SPWH |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $57.3M | $41.5M |
| Share price | $1.94 | $1.06 |
| Change, 1 year | −59.8% | −59.7% |
| Change, 5 years | – | −93.9% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.39 | 0.46 |
| Employees | 50 | 5,400 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 9 (better) | 6 |
| Valuation score | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Growth score | 2 (better) | 0 |
| Performance score | 0 | 0 |
| Health score | 6 (better) | 3 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/S | 0.6× | 0.0× (better) |
| P/B | 0.6× | 0.3× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 30.1× |
| P/FCF | – | 1.3× |
| FCF yield | −35.3% | 76.4% (better) |
| Fair value | $1.35 | $6.60 |
| Margin of safety | −43.6% | 83.9% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 11.4% (better) | 0.84% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | – | −3.6% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −311% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −170% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 12.6% | 30.9% (better) |
| Operating margin | −10.3% | −2.8% (better) |
| Net margin | −7.0% | −3.9% (better) |
| FCF margin | −20.0% | 2.6% (better) |
| Return on equity | −13.7% (better) | −25.8% |
| Return on invested capital | −2424% | −11.7% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | 0.27 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | 15.12 |
| Interest coverage | – | −2.6× |
| Current ratio | 9.42 (better) | 1.17 |
| Altman Z-score | 3.20 (better) | 1.57 |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 (better) | 4 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Buyback yield | 19.5% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 19.5% (better) | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 19.4% | 55.1% |
| Held by insiders | 18.9% | 8.8% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $250K (better) | $0 |
| Short interest, % of float | 9.9% | 0.98% |
Go deeper
- PEW stock overview
- PEW income statement
- PEW valuation and score
- SPWH stock overview
- SPWH income statement
- SPWH valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.