Peoples Bancorp vs Parke Bancorp
PEBO and PKBK side by side, both in commercial banks. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How PEBO and PKBK compare
Peoples Bancorp is the larger company, worth 3.6 times as much as Parke Bancorp ($1.4B against $383M).
On earnings, Parke Bancorp is cheaper: it trades at 8.5× trailing earnings, against 11.4× for Peoples Bancorp.
Parke Bancorp grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (32.3% versus 2.8% for Peoples Bancorp).
Peoples Bancorp keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 136% compared with 50.5% at Parke Bancorp.
Both pay dividends: Peoples Bancorp yields 4.3% and Parke Bancorp 2.3%.
Parke Bancorp scores higher on the StockData Score (18 against 15 for Peoples Bancorp), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | PEBO | PKBK |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $1.4B | $383M |
| Share price | $38.57 | $32.58 |
| Change, 1 year | 34.2% | 50.8% |
| Change, 5 years | 17.7% | 41.5% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.58 | 0.52 |
| Employees | 1,454 | 111 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 15 | 18 (better) |
| Valuation score | 2 | 3 (better) |
| Growth score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Performance score | 4 | 5 (better) |
| Health score | 4 | 4 |
| Dividend score | 5 (better) | 4 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 11.4× | 8.5× (better) |
| P/S | 15.6× | 4.2× (better) |
| P/B | 1.1× | 1.1× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 11.7× | – |
| P/FCF | 8.1× (better) | 8.6× |
| FCF yield | 12.3% (better) | 11.6% |
| Fair value | $37.59 | $34.92 |
| Margin of safety | −2.6% | 6.7% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 2.8% | 32.3% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 10.0% (better) | 3.6% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 19.0% | 47.9% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 18.5% | 49.4% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 11.6% (better) | 5.9% |
| Profitability | ||
| Operating margin | 171% | – |
| Net margin | 136% (better) | 50.5% |
| FCF margin | 192% (better) | 49.1% |
| Return on equity | 10.1% | 13.9% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 7.7% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.57 | – |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 2.65 | – |
| Altman Z-score | 0.23 | 0.29 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | 7 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 4.3% (better) | 2.3% |
| Payout ratio | 49.1% | 18.2% |
| Years of dividend growth | 8 (better) | 0 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 3.5% | – |
| Buyback yield | −0.06% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 4.2% (better) | 2.3% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 66.1% | 63.8% |
| Held by insiders | 3.8% | 12.8% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$191K (better) | −$2.0M |
| Short interest, % of float | 5.3% | 2.1% |
Go deeper
- PEBO stock overview
- PEBO income statement
- PEBO valuation and score
- PKBK stock overview
- PKBK income statement
- PKBK valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.