PBF Energy vs Phillips 66
PBF and PSX side by side, both in petroleum refining. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How PBF and PSX compare
Phillips 66 is the larger company, worth 12 times as much as PBF Energy ($113B against $9.2B).
On earnings, PBF Energy is cheaper: it trades at 3.5× trailing earnings, against 16.2× for Phillips 66.
PBF Energy grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (31.5% versus 14.4% for Phillips 66).
PBF Energy keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 7.0% compared with 4.7% at Phillips 66.
Both pay dividends: PBF Energy yields 1.4% and Phillips 66 1.8%.
PBF Energy scores higher on the StockData Score (19 against 13 for Phillips 66), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | PBF | PSX |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $9.2B | $113B |
| Share price | $78.00 | $282.83 |
| Change, 1 year | 129% | 105% |
| Change, 5 years | 431% | 264% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.35 | 0.58 |
| Employees | 3,678 | 13K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 19 (better) | 13 |
| Valuation score | 5 (better) | 1 |
| Growth score | 2 | 2 |
| Performance score | 5 (better) | 3 |
| Health score | 6 (better) | 4 |
| Dividend score | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 3.5× (better) | 16.2× |
| P/S | 0.2× (better) | 0.7× |
| P/B | 1.2× (better) | 3.6× |
| EV/EBITDA | 2.3× | – |
| P/FCF | 3.5× | – |
| FCF yield | 28.4% | – |
| Fair value | $233.11 | $257.88 |
| Margin of safety | 66.5% (better) | −9.7% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 31.5% (better) | 14.4% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 14.2% | 15.6% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | 313% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | 320% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 8.9% | 13.1% (better) |
| Operating margin | 9.8% | – |
| Net margin | 7.0% (better) | 4.7% |
| FCF margin | 6.8% | – |
| Return on equity | 41.1% (better) | 24.0% |
| Return on invested capital | 39.1% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.27 (better) | 0.65 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | −0.11 | – |
| Interest coverage | 25.0× | – |
| Current ratio | 1.59 (better) | 1.32 |
| Altman Z-score | 4.26 (better) | 3.95 |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 | 7 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 1.4% | 1.8% (better) |
| Payout ratio | – | 28.0% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 14 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 5.7% |
| Buyback yield | – | 0.89% |
| Shareholder yield | 1.4% | 2.7% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 88.4% | 79.7% |
| Held by insiders | 27.8% | 0.23% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$994M | −$63.3M (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | – | 4 |
| Short interest, % of float | 13.8% | 1.4% |
Go deeper
- PBF stock overview
- PBF income statement
- PBF valuation and score
- PSX stock overview
- PSX income statement
- PSX valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.