Payoneer Global vs Priority Technology
PAYO and PRTH side by side, both in miscellaneous business services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How PAYO and PRTH compare
Payoneer Global is the larger company, worth 3.7 times as much as Priority Technology ($2.4B against $646M).
On earnings, Priority Technology is cheaper: it trades at 11.4× trailing earnings, against 47.7× for Payoneer Global.
Priority Technology grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (8.9% versus 6.3% for Payoneer Global).
Payoneer Global scores higher on the StockData Score (11 against 8 for Priority Technology), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | PAYO | PRTH |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $2.4B | $646M |
| Share price | $7.15 | $7.84 |
| Change, 1 year | 21.8% | 10.0% |
| Change, 5 years | −5.9% | 25.6% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.17 | 1.01 |
| Employees | 2,540 | 1,200 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 11 (better) | 8 |
| Valuation score | 0 | 4 (better) |
| Growth score | 2 | 2 |
| Performance score | 4 (better) | 1 |
| Health score | 5 (better) | 1 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 47.7× | 11.4× (better) |
| P/S | 2.2× | 0.6× (better) |
| P/B | 3.7× | – |
| EV/EBITDA | 11.0× | 7.5× (better) |
| P/FCF | 13.4× | 6.2× (better) |
| FCF yield | 7.5% | 16.0% (better) |
| Fair value | $5.78 | $16.10 |
| Margin of safety | −23.6% | 51.3% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 6.3% | 8.9% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 25.0% (better) | 18.7% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −49.6% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −40.0% | 165% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | 12.3% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | – | 39.4% |
| Operating margin | 10.4% | 13.8% (better) |
| Net margin | 4.6% | – |
| FCF margin | 16.8% (better) | 10.4% |
| Return on equity | 7.1% | – |
| Return on invested capital | 20.8% (better) | 13.8% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | – |
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | 4.38 |
| Interest coverage | – | 1.6× |
| Current ratio | 1.00 | 1.10 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 0.38 | 0.77 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 | – |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Buyback yield | 8.9% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 8.9% (better) | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 89.5% | 23.6% |
| Held by insiders | 21.0% | 59.6% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$175K | −$23.8K (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 5.3% | – |
Go deeper
- PAYO stock overview
- PAYO income statement
- PAYO valuation and score
- PRTH stock overview
- PRTH income statement
- PRTH valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.