StockData

Pampa Energy vs TransAlta

PAM and TAC side by side, both in electric services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How PAM and TAC compare

Pampa Energy grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (6.5% versus −15.5% for TransAlta).

Pampa Energy keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 18.9% compared with −5.7% at TransAlta.

Pampa Energy scores higher on the StockData Score (5 against 0 for TransAlta), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricPAMTAC
Size and price
Share price$65.21$13.21
Change, 1 year−26.8%−13.4%
Change, 5 years267%21.1%
Beta (5Y)0.650.71
Employees1,847–
StockData Score
Total score5 (better)0
Valuation score00
Growth score00
Performance score2 (better)0
Health score3 (better)0
Dividend score00
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)6.5% (better)−15.5%
Revenue growth, 5Y average13.2% (better)2.7%
Net income growth (TTM)−39.1% (better)−160%
EPS growth (TTM)−39.1% (better)−208%
Profitability
Gross margin31.5%59.0% (better)
Operating margin25.2% (better)5.8%
Net margin18.9% (better)−5.7%
FCF margin−10.8%16.5% (better)
Return on equity11.0% (better)−8.8%
Return on invested capital8.5% (better)2.2%
Financial health
Debt / equity0.53 (better)2.57
Net debt / EBITDA1.27 (better)4.71
Interest coverage2.6× (better)0.4×
Current ratio3.11 (better)0.73
Piotroski F-score5 (better)4
Ownership
Held by institutions0.38%79.9%
Held by insiders30.9%9.1%
Insider net buying, 12 months$19.0M–
Superinvestors holding–1

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.