Ranpak vs Reynolds Consumer Products
PACK and REYN side by side, both in paper and allied products. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How PACK and REYN compare
Reynolds Consumer Products is the larger company, worth 17 times as much as Ranpak ($5.2B against $305M).
Ranpak grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (8.3% versus 2.5% for Reynolds Consumer Products).
Reynolds Consumer Products keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 8.5% compared with −8.3% at Ranpak.
Reynolds Consumer Products pays a dividend yielding 3.7%; Ranpak does not pay one.
Reynolds Consumer Products scores higher on the StockData Score (17 against 6 for Ranpak), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | PACK | REYN |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $305M | $5.2B |
| Share price | $3.55 | $24.81 |
| Change, 1 year | −29.0% | 0.45% |
| Change, 5 years | −91.6% | −16.9% |
| Beta (5Y) | 2.02 | 0.37 |
| Employees | 800 | 6,000 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 6 | 17 (better) |
| Valuation score | 3 | 4 (better) |
| Growth score | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Performance score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Health score | 2 | 3 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 4 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 16.1× |
| P/S | 0.7× (better) | 1.4× |
| P/B | 0.6× (better) | 2.2× |
| EV/EBITDA | 14.9× | 10.5× (better) |
| P/FCF | – | 18.6× |
| PEG | – | 3.13 |
| FCF yield | – | 5.4% |
| Fair value | $4.17 | $27.57 |
| Margin of safety | 14.9% (better) | 10.0% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 8.3% (better) | 2.5% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 5.8% (better) | 2.7% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | 6.3% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | 6.2% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | −4.2% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 33.8% (better) | 25.1% |
| Operating margin | −1.7% | – |
| Net margin | −8.3% | 8.5% (better) |
| FCF margin | – | 7.4% |
| Return on equity | −6.6% | 14.3% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | −0.64% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.79 | 0.66 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 8.01 | 2.34 (better) |
| Interest coverage | −0.2× | – |
| Current ratio | 1.79 | 1.80 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 0.48 | 2.23 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 | 5 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 3.7% |
| Payout ratio | – | 59.8% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 0 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 9.3% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 3.7% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 89.9% | 31.1% |
| Held by insiders | 45.3% | 0.47% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$18.7K | $99.1K (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 4.2% | 4.0% |
Go deeper
- PACK stock overview
- PACK income statement
- PACK valuation and score
- REYN stock overview
- REYN income statement
- REYN valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.