Pan American Silver vs Wheaton Precious Metals
PAAS and WPM side by side, both in materials. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How PAAS and WPM compare
Wheaton Precious Metals grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (80.2% versus 28.4% for Pan American Silver).
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | PAAS | WPM |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Share price | $37.98 | $116.58 |
| Change, 1 year | 8.2% | 22.5% |
| Change, 5 years | 46.1% | 184% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.91 | 0.74 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 7 | 7 |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 2 | 5 (better) |
| Performance score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Health score | 4 (better) | 2 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 28.4% | 80.2% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 22.0% (better) | 16.1% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 726% (better) | 178% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 24.7% (better) | 23.5% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 38.8% | 72.2% (better) |
| Operating margin | 34.1% | 68.3% (better) |
| FCF margin | 28.2% | – |
| Return on invested capital | 17.7% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.10 | – |
| Net debt / EBITDA | −0.29 | 1.18 (better) |
| Interest coverage | 411× (better) | 275× |
| Current ratio | 2.69 (better) | 0.47 |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 51.7% | 67.1% |
| Held by insiders | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Short interest, % of float | – | 1.3% |
Go deeper
- PAAS stock overview
- PAAS income statement
- PAAS valuation and score
- WPM stock overview
- WPM income statement
- WPM valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.