Everpure vs Sandisk
P and SNDK side by side, both in computer and office equipment. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How P and SNDK compare
Sandisk is the larger company, worth 4.0 times as much as Everpure ($169B against $42.3B).
On earnings, Sandisk is cheaper: it trades at 9.2× trailing earnings, against 174× for Everpure.
Sandisk grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (272% versus 27.2% for Everpure).
Sandisk keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 67.0% compared with 5.9% at Everpure.
Sandisk scores higher on the StockData Score (17 against 15 for Everpure), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | P | SNDK |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $42.3B | $169B |
| Share price | $126.98 | $1150.89 |
| Change, 1 year | 30.1% | 463% |
| Change, 5 years | 358% | 2192% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.57 | 2.60 |
| Employees | 6,400 | 11K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 15 | 17 (better) |
| Valuation score | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Growth score | 4 | 4 |
| Performance score | 4 | 4 |
| Health score | 6 | 6 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 174× | 9.2× (better) |
| P/S | 9.9× | 5.8× (better) |
| P/B | 27.5× | 9.3× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 111× | 7.7× (better) |
| P/FCF | 330× | 9.7× (better) |
| PEG | 5.16 | – |
| FCF yield | 0.30% | 10.3% (better) |
| Fair value | $31.99 | $3286.19 |
| Margin of safety | −297% | 65.0% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 27.2% | 272% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 16.8% | – |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 82.0% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 78.0% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 69.7% | 80.0% (better) |
| Operating margin | 5.3% | 72.5% (better) |
| Net margin | 5.9% | 67.0% (better) |
| FCF margin | 3.0% | 59.9% (better) |
| Return on equity | 17.7% | 141% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 25.6% | 165% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Interest coverage | 214× | 600× (better) |
| Current ratio | 1.51 | 2.58 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 7.83 | 18.41 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 7 (better) | 6 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Buyback yield | 0.79% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 0.79% (better) | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 83.0% | 75.6% |
| Held by insiders | 3.6% | 1.2% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$284M | −$133M (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 2.5% | 3.3% |
Go deeper
- P stock overview
- P income statement
- P valuation and score
- SNDK stock overview
- SNDK income statement
- SNDK valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.