StockData

Owlet vs Senseonics

OWLT and SENS side by side, both in laboratory apparatus and analytical, optical, measuring, and controlling instruments. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How OWLT and SENS compare

Senseonics is the larger company, worth 5.6 times as much as Owlet ($559M against $101M).

Senseonics grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (105% versus 13.9% for Owlet).

Owlet keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −10.2% compared with −204% at Senseonics.

Owlet scores higher on the StockData Score (8 against 6 for Senseonics), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricOWLTSENS
Size and price
Market cap$101M$559M
Share price$3.44$10.58
Change, 1 year−68.7%60.5%
Change, 5 years−93.9%−84.8%
Beta (5Y)1.771.85
Employees108130
StockData Score
Total score8 (better)6
Valuation score2 (better)0
Growth score44
Performance score11
Health score11
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S0.9× (better)9.3×
P/B3.8× (better)7.2×
FCF yield−4.5% (better)−20.4%
Fair value$7.31$8.56
Margin of safety52.9% (better)−23.5%
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)13.9%105% (better)
Revenue growth, 5Y average7.1%48.1% (better)
Profitability
Gross margin55.7%58.7% (better)
Operating margin−6.4% (better)−201%
Net margin−10.2% (better)−204%
FCF margin−4.0% (better)−190%
Return on equity–−157%
Financial health
Debt / equity0.42–
Interest coverage−155.2×−20.8× (better)
Current ratio1.915.92 (better)
Altman Z-score−2.07 (better)−6.83
Piotroski F-score56 (better)
Dividends and buybacks
Shareholder yield0.00%0.00%
Ownership
Held by institutions58.2%39.4%
Held by insiders–5.7%
Insider net buying, 12 months−$296K$451K (better)
Short interest, % of float–9.5%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.