StockData

Owlet vs Pulsenmore

OWLT and PLSM side by side. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How OWLT and PLSM compare

Pulsenmore grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (314% versus 13.9% for Owlet).

Owlet scores higher on the StockData Score (8 against 3 for Pulsenmore), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricOWLTPLSM
Size and price
Market cap$101M–
Share price$3.44$1.38
Change, 1 year−68.7%–
Change, 5 years−93.9%–
Beta (5Y)1.77–
Employees10863
StockData Score
Total score8 (better)3
Valuation score2 (better)0
Growth score4 (better)2
Performance score1 (better)0
Health score11
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S0.9×–
P/B3.8×–
FCF yield−4.5%–
Fair value$7.31–
Margin of safety52.9%–
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)13.9%314% (better)
Revenue growth, 5Y average7.1%–
EPS growth (TTM)–−57.3%
Profitability
Gross margin55.7%84.2% (better)
Operating margin−6.4%–
Net margin−10.2%–
FCF margin−4.0% (better)−82.5%
Financial health
Debt / equity0.42–
Interest coverage−155.2×–
Current ratio1.91 (better)1.84
Altman Z-score−2.07–
Piotroski F-score5–
Dividends and buybacks
Shareholder yield0.00%–
Ownership
Held by institutions58.2%5.5%
Held by insiders–31.8%
Insider net buying, 12 months−$296K$15.7K (better)
Superinvestors holding–1

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.