Ohio Valley Banc vs Peoples Bancorp
OVBC and PEBO side by side, both in commercial banks. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How OVBC and PEBO compare
Peoples Bancorp is the larger company, worth 6.1 times as much as Ohio Valley Banc ($1.4B against $227M).
On earnings, Peoples Bancorp is cheaper: it trades at 11.4× trailing earnings, against 16.0× for Ohio Valley Banc.
Ohio Valley Banc grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (4.1% versus 2.8% for Peoples Bancorp).
Peoples Bancorp keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 136% compared with 20.5% at Ohio Valley Banc.
Both pay dividends: Ohio Valley Banc yields 2.5% and Peoples Bancorp 4.3%.
Peoples Bancorp scores higher on the StockData Score (15 against 7 for Ohio Valley Banc), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | OVBC | PEBO |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $227M | $1.4B |
| Share price | $48.22 | $38.57 |
| Change, 1 year | 39.1% | 34.2% |
| Change, 5 years | 75.7% | 17.7% |
| Beta (5Y) | −0.09 | 0.58 |
| Employees | 269 | 1,454 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 7 | 15 (better) |
| Valuation score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Growth score | 0 | 0 |
| Performance score | 1 | 4 (better) |
| Health score | 2 | 4 (better) |
| Dividend score | 3 | 5 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 16.0× | 11.4× (better) |
| P/S | 3.3× (better) | 15.6× |
| P/B | 1.3× | 1.1× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 11.7× |
| P/FCF | 11.5× | 8.1× (better) |
| FCF yield | 8.7% | 12.3% (better) |
| Fair value | $38.07 | $37.59 |
| Margin of safety | −26.7% | −2.6% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 4.1% (better) | 2.8% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 5.3% | 10.0% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 2.6% | 19.0% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 2.4% | 18.5% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | 11.6% |
| Profitability | ||
| Operating margin | – | 171% |
| Net margin | 20.5% | 136% (better) |
| FCF margin | 28.4% | 192% (better) |
| Return on equity | 8.5% | 10.1% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | – | 7.7% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 0.57 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | 2.65 |
| Altman Z-score | 0.25 (better) | 0.23 |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 (better) | 5 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 2.5% | 4.3% (better) |
| Payout ratio | 31.2% | 49.1% |
| Years of dividend growth | 1 | 8 (better) |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 1.6% | 3.5% (better) |
| Buyback yield | – | −0.06% |
| Shareholder yield | 2.5% | 4.2% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 30.3% | 66.1% |
| Held by insiders | 5.2% | 3.8% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$242K | −$191K (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 1.1% | 5.3% |
Go deeper
- OVBC stock overview
- OVBC income statement
- OVBC valuation and score
- PEBO stock overview
- PEBO income statement
- PEBO valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.