StockData

Oatly Group AB vs Vital Farms

OTLY and VITL side by side, both in food and kindred products. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How OTLY and VITL compare

Vital Farms grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (16.4% versus 4.7% for Oatly Group AB).

Vital Farms keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 0.02% compared with −17.7% at Oatly Group AB.

Vital Farms scores higher on the StockData Score (12 against 4 for Oatly Group AB), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricOTLYVITL
Size and price
Market cap–$407M
Share price$7.96$9.47
Change, 1 year−48.3%−71.3%
Change, 5 years−96.0%−50.1%
Beta (5Y)1.820.74
Employees94739
StockData Score
Total score412 (better)
Valuation score01 (better)
Growth score33
Performance score13 (better)
Health score05 (better)
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S–0.5×
P/B–1.4×
EV/EBITDA–39.2×
FCF yield–−31.0%
Fair value–$8.45
Margin of safety–−12.1%
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)4.7%16.4% (better)
Revenue growth, 5Y average15.4%28.8% (better)
Net income growth (TTM)–−99.7%
EPS growth (TTM)–−104%
EPS growth, 5Y average–39.8%
Profitability
Gross margin32.1% (better)28.1%
Operating margin−7.9%0.04% (better)
Net margin−17.7%0.02% (better)
FCF margin−4.2% (better)−16.5%
Return on equity−431%0.05% (better)
Return on invested capital−17.8%0.07% (better)
Financial health
Debt / equity–0.00
Interest coverage−0.8×0.3× (better)
Current ratio0.431.10 (better)
Altman Z-score–3.01
Piotroski F-score4 (better)3
Dividends and buybacks
Shareholder yield–0.00%
Ownership
Held by institutions0.67%85.3%
Held by insiders10.3%39.4%
Insider net buying, 12 months−$464K (better)−$3.5M
Short interest, % of float–36.9%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.