OneSpan vs Telos
OSPN and TLS side by side, both in computer programming, data processing, and other computer related services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How OSPN and TLS compare
OneSpan is the larger company, worth 1.4 times as much as Telos ($828M against $577M).
Telos grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (36.7% versus 4.9% for OneSpan).
OneSpan keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 27.5% compared with −4.7% at Telos.
OneSpan pays a dividend yielding 2.9%; Telos does not pay one.
OneSpan scores higher on the StockData Score (18 against 5 for Telos), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | OSPN | TLS |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $828M | $577M |
| Share price | $22.43 | $7.72 |
| Change, 1 year | 73.9% | 18.0% |
| Change, 5 years | 21.7% | −59.0% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.36 | 1.96 |
| Employees | 602 | 525 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 18 (better) | 5 |
| Valuation score | 4 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 1 | 1 |
| Performance score | 4 (better) | 2 |
| Health score | 6 (better) | 2 |
| Dividend score | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 12.5× | – |
| P/S | 3.3× | 2.9× (better) |
| P/B | 2.9× (better) | 6.1× |
| EV/EBITDA | 13.3× (better) | 513× |
| P/FCF | 18.5× | 16.8× (better) |
| FCF yield | 5.4% | 6.0% (better) |
| Fair value | $28.62 | – |
| Margin of safety | 21.6% | – |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 4.9% | 36.7% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 2.4% (better) | −1.7% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 19.8% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 22.4% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 74.3% (better) | 36.1% |
| Operating margin | 17.9% (better) | −6.4% |
| Net margin | 27.5% (better) | −4.7% |
| FCF margin | 17.6% (better) | 17.4% |
| Return on equity | 26.8% (better) | −8.6% |
| Return on invested capital | 23.7% (better) | −19.4% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | – |
| Interest coverage | – | −28.3× |
| Current ratio | 1.35 | 2.49 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 6.08 (better) | 5.89 |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 | 6 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 2.9% | – |
| Payout ratio | 27.6% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | – |
| Buyback yield | 1.8% | 3.2% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | 4.7% (better) | 3.2% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 96.3% | 67.7% |
| Held by insiders | 2.0% | 16.9% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$829K (better) | −$8.2M |
| Short interest, % of float | 9.7% | 3.8% |
Go deeper
- OSPN stock overview
- OSPN income statement
- OSPN valuation and score
- TLS stock overview
- TLS income statement
- TLS valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.