OSI Systems vs Sonos
OSIS and SONO side by side. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How OSIS and SONO compare
OSI Systems is the larger company, worth 1.4 times as much as Sonos ($3.0B against $2.1B).
On earnings, OSI Systems is cheaper: it trades at 20.7× trailing earnings, against 39.9× for Sonos.
Sonos grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (5.6% versus 2.9% for OSI Systems).
OSI Systems keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 8.8% compared with 3.8% at Sonos.
OSI Systems scores higher on the StockData Score (15 against 13 for Sonos), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | OSIS | SONO |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $3.0B | $2.1B |
| Share price | $192.92 | $17.97 |
| Change, 1 year | −31.9% | 5.0% |
| Change, 5 years | 103% | −43.4% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.08 | 1.50 |
| Employees | 7,806 | 1,404 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 15 (better) | 13 |
| Valuation score | 3 (better) | 1 |
| Growth score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Performance score | 5 (better) | 4 |
| Health score | 4 | 6 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 20.7× (better) | 39.9× |
| P/S | 1.7× | 1.4× (better) |
| P/B | 3.9× (better) | 5.3× |
| EV/EBITDA | 14.3× (better) | 16.5× |
| P/FCF | 11.5× (better) | 17.0× |
| PEG | 1.10 | – |
| FCF yield | 8.7% (better) | 5.9% |
| Fair value | $234.57 | $16.07 |
| Margin of safety | 17.8% (better) | −11.8% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 2.9% | 5.6% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 9.3% (better) | 1.7% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 4.2% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 5.7% | – |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 17.3% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 32.9% | 46.5% (better) |
| Operating margin | 12.2% (better) | 4.4% |
| Net margin | 8.8% (better) | 3.8% |
| FCF margin | 14.7% (better) | 8.4% |
| Return on equity | 18.4% (better) | 14.2% |
| Return on invested capital | 12.9% | 26.8% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 1.28 (better) | 0.00 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 2.67 | – |
| Interest coverage | 9.9× | 144× (better) |
| Current ratio | 2.89 (better) | 1.61 |
| Altman Z-score | 3.04 | 4.88 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 | 5 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Buyback yield | – | 5.4% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 5.4% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 121% | 102% |
| Held by insiders | 6.8% | 18.3% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$10.8M | $45.0M (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 13.1% | 17.1% |
Go deeper
- OSIS stock overview
- OSIS income statement
- OSIS valuation and score
- SONO stock overview
- SONO income statement
- SONO valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.