OSI Systems vs Penguin Solutions
OSIS and PENG side by side, both in electronic components and accessories. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How OSIS and PENG compare
OSI Systems and Penguin Solutions are about the same size, with market caps of $3.0B and $2.9B.
On earnings, Penguin Solutions is cheaper: it trades at 18.2× trailing earnings, against 20.7× for OSI Systems.
Penguin Solutions grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (26.5% versus 2.9% for OSI Systems).
Penguin Solutions keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 10.4% compared with 8.8% at OSI Systems.
OSI Systems scores higher on the StockData Score (15 against 14 for Penguin Solutions), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | OSIS | PENG |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $3.0B | $2.9B |
| Share price | $192.92 | $47.36 |
| Change, 1 year | −31.9% | 128% |
| Change, 5 years | 103% | 63.1% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.08 | 2.12 |
| Employees | 7,806 | 2,800 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 15 (better) | 14 |
| Valuation score | 3 | 5 (better) |
| Growth score | 3 | 3 |
| Performance score | 5 | 5 |
| Health score | 4 (better) | 1 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 20.7× | 18.2× (better) |
| P/S | 1.7× | 1.6× (better) |
| P/B | 3.9× (better) | 5.5× |
| EV/EBITDA | 14.3× | 14.0× (better) |
| P/FCF | 11.5× | – |
| PEG | 1.10 | – |
| FCF yield | 8.7% (better) | −5.7% |
| Fair value | $234.57 | $78.50 |
| Margin of safety | 17.8% | 39.7% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 2.9% | 26.5% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 9.3% | 10.4% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 4.2% | 611% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 5.7% | 829% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 17.3% | 42.7% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 32.9% (better) | 27.7% |
| Operating margin | 12.2% (better) | 9.6% |
| Net margin | 8.8% | 10.4% (better) |
| FCF margin | 14.7% (better) | −9.4% |
| Return on equity | 18.4% | 39.5% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 12.9% | 31.1% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 1.28 (better) | 1.52 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 2.67 | 0.66 (better) |
| Interest coverage | 9.9× | – |
| Current ratio | 2.89 (better) | 1.88 |
| Altman Z-score | 3.04 (better) | 2.22 |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 | 4 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Buyback yield | – | 2.2% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 2.2% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 121% | 95.1% |
| Held by insiders | 6.8% | 14.2% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$10.8M | −$5.0M (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 13.1% | 12.4% |
Go deeper
- OSIS stock overview
- OSIS income statement
- OSIS valuation and score
- PENG stock overview
- PENG income statement
- PENG valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.