O Reilly Automotive vs CarParts.com
ORLY and PRTS side by side, both in automotive dealers and gasoline service stations. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How ORLY and PRTS compare
O Reilly Automotive is the larger company, worth 1281 times as much as CarParts.com ($71.3B against $55.7M).
O Reilly Automotive grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (8.5% versus −10.7% for CarParts.com).
O Reilly Automotive keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 14.3% compared with −5.4% at CarParts.com.
O Reilly Automotive scores higher on the StockData Score (12 against 4 for CarParts.com), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | ORLY | PRTS |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $71.3B | $55.7M |
| Share price | $88.12 | $6.90 |
| Change, 1 year | −6.8% | 2.8% |
| Change, 5 years | 107% | −95.6% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.47 | 0.93 |
| Employees | 93K | 741 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 12 (better) | 4 |
| Valuation score | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Growth score | 5 (better) | 0 |
| Performance score | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Health score | 3 (better) | 1 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 28.1× | – |
| P/S | 3.8× | 0.1× (better) |
| P/B | – | 1.0× |
| EV/EBITDA | 18.7× | – |
| P/FCF | 33.1× | – |
| PEG | 2.80 | – |
| FCF yield | 3.0% (better) | −20.4% |
| Fair value | $61.78 | $11.92 |
| Margin of safety | −42.6% | 42.1% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 8.5% (better) | −10.7% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 8.9% (better) | 4.3% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 9.4% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 12.5% | – |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 13.6% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 51.6% (better) | 33.0% |
| Operating margin | 19.6% (better) | −5.3% |
| Net margin | 14.3% (better) | −5.4% |
| FCF margin | 11.6% (better) | −2.2% |
| Return on equity | – | −46.3% |
| Return on invested capital | 60.8% (better) | −71.1% |
| Financial health | ||
| Net debt / EBITDA | 1.62 | – |
| Interest coverage | 14.4× (better) | −14.7× |
| Current ratio | 0.75 | 1.67 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 3.54 (better) | 0.77 |
| Piotroski F-score | 7 (better) | 4 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Buyback yield | 4.7% (better) | −33.7% |
| Shareholder yield | 4.7% (better) | −33.7% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 88.5% | 10.5% |
| Held by insiders | 0.55% | 22.8% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$11.7M | $2.1M (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | 3 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 3.1% | 7.3% |
Go deeper
- ORLY stock overview
- ORLY income statement
- ORLY valuation and score
- PRTS stock overview
- PRTS income statement
- PRTS valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.