Oppenheimer vs Piper Sandler Companies
OPY and PIPR side by side, both in security brokers, dealers, and flotation. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How OPY and PIPR compare
Piper Sandler Companies is the larger company, worth 4.9 times as much as Oppenheimer ($4.5B against $923M).
On earnings, Oppenheimer is cheaper: it trades at 11.6× trailing earnings, against 14.8× for Piper Sandler Companies.
Piper Sandler Companies grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (32.1% versus 13.9% for Oppenheimer).
Piper Sandler Companies keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 14.5% compared with 4.9% at Oppenheimer.
Both pay dividends: Oppenheimer yields 0.88% and Piper Sandler Companies 3.1%.
Piper Sandler Companies scores higher on the StockData Score (15 against 14 for Oppenheimer), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | OPY | PIPR |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $923M | $4.5B |
| Share price | $86.20 | $63.81 |
| Change, 1 year | 25.3% | −21.8% |
| Change, 5 years | 62.2% | 42.5% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.82 | 1.31 |
| Employees | 2,947 | 1,858 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 14 | 15 (better) |
| Valuation score | 4 (better) | 3 |
| Growth score | 2 | 2 |
| Performance score | 1 | 5 (better) |
| Health score | 4 (better) | 3 |
| Dividend score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 11.6× (better) | 14.8× |
| P/S | 0.5× (better) | 2.1× |
| P/B | 0.9× (better) | 3.3× |
| EV/EBITDA | 7.1× | – |
| P/FCF | 16.1× | – |
| PEG | 0.16 (better) | 0.43 |
| FCF yield | 6.2% | – |
| Fair value | $114.09 | $71.95 |
| Margin of safety | 24.4% (better) | 11.3% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 13.9% | 32.1% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 6.4% | 8.7% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 2.2% | 45.7% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −0.94% | 46.0% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 7.0% | 42.2% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Operating margin | 7.2% | – |
| Net margin | 4.9% | 14.5% (better) |
| FCF margin | 3.3% | – |
| Return on equity | 9.1% | 23.6% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 9.4% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | 0.01 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 1.04 | 4.91 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | 6 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 0.88% | 3.1% (better) |
| Payout ratio | 21.5% | 46.0% |
| Years of dividend growth | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | −13.4% | 23.3% (better) |
| Buyback yield | 0.25% | 2.8% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | 1.1% | 5.9% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 41.7% | 87.4% |
| Held by insiders | 6.0% | 2.0% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$420K (better) | −$12.9M |
| Short interest, % of float | 0.98% | 4.0% |
Go deeper
- OPY stock overview
- OPY income statement
- OPY valuation and score
- PIPR stock overview
- PIPR income statement
- PIPR valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.