Openlane vs Valvoline
OPLN and VVV side by side. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How OPLN and VVV compare
Openlane is the larger company, worth 1.2 times as much as Valvoline ($4.8B against $4.1B).
Valvoline grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (16.1% versus 11.8% for Openlane).
Openlane keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 9.7% compared with 5.2% at Valvoline.
Openlane scores higher on the StockData Score (12 against 9 for Valvoline), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | OPLN | VVV |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $4.8B | $4.1B |
| Share price | $38.76 | $32.29 |
| Change, 1 year | 43.6% | −1.3% |
| Change, 5 years | 164% | −5.8% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.03 | 0.81 |
| Employees | 4,800 | 11K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 12 (better) | 9 |
| Valuation score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Growth score | 2 | 3 (better) |
| Performance score | 5 (better) | 4 |
| Health score | 5 (better) | 1 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 40.9× |
| P/S | 2.3× | 2.1× (better) |
| P/B | 3.0× (better) | 9.9× |
| EV/EBITDA | 15.5× (better) | 18.7× |
| P/FCF | 13.4× (better) | 30.4× |
| FCF yield | 7.4% (better) | 3.3% |
| Fair value | $21.29 | $19.95 |
| Margin of safety | −82.1% | −61.9% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 11.8% | 16.1% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 7.8% | 18.7% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 32.8% (better) | −63.5% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | −63.3% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | −0.60% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 45.8% (better) | 38.3% |
| Operating margin | 11.5% | 15.3% (better) |
| Net margin | 9.7% (better) | 5.2% |
| FCF margin | 17.1% (better) | 6.9% |
| Return on equity | 13.4% | 27.8% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 13.9% (better) | 10.9% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.34 (better) | 3.84 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 1.05 (better) | 5.04 |
| Interest coverage | 7.7× | – |
| Current ratio | 1.17 (better) | 0.70 |
| Altman Z-score | 1.71 | 1.75 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 7 | 8 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Buyback yield | 1.8% (better) | 0.00% |
| Shareholder yield | 1.8% (better) | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 87.7% | 117% |
| Held by insiders | 7.8% | 0.33% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$283M | $308K (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 1.8% | 12.1% |
Go deeper
- OPLN stock overview
- OPLN income statement
- OPLN valuation and score
- VVV stock overview
- VVV income statement
- VVV valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.