Ooma vs Yext
OOMA and YEXT side by side, both in computer programming, data processing, and other computer related services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How OOMA and YEXT compare
Yext is the larger company, worth 1.5 times as much as Ooma ($759M against $498M).
On earnings, Yext is cheaper: it trades at 45.1× trailing earnings, against 47.5× for Ooma.
Ooma grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (17.2% versus −1.5% for Yext).
Yext keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 5.9% compared with 3.6% at Ooma.
Ooma scores higher on the StockData Score (10 against 5 for Yext), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | OOMA | YEXT |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $498M | $759M |
| Share price | $18.06 | $7.67 |
| Change, 1 year | 53.7% | −11.6% |
| Change, 5 years | −9.7% | −29.2% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.76 | 1.10 |
| Employees | 1,420 | 1,120 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 10 (better) | 5 |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Performance score | 4 | 4 |
| Health score | 3 (better) | 1 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 47.5× | 45.1× (better) |
| P/S | 1.6× (better) | 1.7× |
| P/B | 5.1× (better) | 21.3× |
| EV/EBITDA | 30.6× | 22.2× (better) |
| P/FCF | 16.4× | 14.3× (better) |
| FCF yield | 6.1% | 7.0% (better) |
| Fair value | $10.46 | $5.23 |
| Margin of safety | −72.6% | −46.5% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 17.2% (better) | −1.5% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 10.1% (better) | 4.7% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | 251% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 61.5% | 74.0% (better) |
| Operating margin | 3.6% | 8.3% (better) |
| Net margin | 3.6% | 5.9% (better) |
| FCF margin | 9.9% | 12.0% (better) |
| Return on equity | 11.7% | 27.8% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 14.5% | 40.7% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.01 (better) | 4.14 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | −1.03 | 1.65 (better) |
| Interest coverage | – | 3.3× |
| Current ratio | 0.95 (better) | 0.83 |
| Altman Z-score | 3.04 (better) | 0.19 |
| Piotroski F-score | 7 (better) | 5 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Buyback yield | 1.9% | 22.8% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | 1.9% | 22.8% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 72.3% | 74.2% |
| Held by insiders | 12.3% | 35.8% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$5.7M (better) | −$27.8M |
| Short interest, % of float | 7.4% | 10.2% |
Go deeper
- OOMA stock overview
- OOMA income statement
- OOMA valuation and score
- YEXT stock overview
- YEXT income statement
- YEXT valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.